Wednesday, July 21, 2010

vindicated by the transcript

Plaintiff S121/2010 v The Commonwealth of Australia [2010] HCATrans 171

HAYNE J: Does the evidence reveal that something that accords with that statutory term has been made, lodged, whatever one does with an application for visa?

MR GLASS: No, it does not, your Honour. The question with section 46A(2) - - -

HIS HONOUR: Section 46A(2), not 46(2)?

MR GLASS: Yes, I apologise, your Honour. Did I say 46?

HIS HONOUR: Right. So 46A(2) you say is triggered by what has occurred. I see.



haven't been drawing or blogging for a while.
i blame the lack of amusing advocacy in the High Court.
even this one is only funny because it makes Hayne J look daft.

Thursday, June 3, 2010

leave sought to chillax

Gove (Blackman) v Owners of the Old Soap Factory [2010] HCATrans 147
[After hearing appearances from the appellants]


GUMMOW J: We will hear first – I am sorry.

MR GLEESON, SC: May it please your Honours, I appear for the humble City of Fremantle ...

GUMMOW J: Yes, we have just been trying to line up your enemies.

MR GLEESON: I have no applications myself other than to be allowed to sit quietly down the other end of the Bar table for a short period of time.

GUMMOW J: Thank you Mr Gleeson.

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Gummow's not scared of nothing

Port of Portland Pty Ltd v State of Victoria [2010] HCATrans 108

MS KENNY SC: So if the appeal proceeds, your Honours are going to be taken to some fairly obscure pieces of legislation which have not yet been ruled upon by the Court of Appeal.

GUMMOW J: That does not intimidate us.

Thursday, April 22, 2010

nothing like saving some time

Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Limited [2010] HCATrans 94

MR GLEESON SC: With respect, his Honour Associate Justice of Appeal Robson mishandles the evidence on this point.

CRENNAN J: He is an Acting Judge of Appeal.

MR GLEESON: I am sorry. Did I say “Associate”?

CRENNAN J: Yes; just a slip of the tongue, I think, Mr Gleeson.

MR GLEESON: Yes; I apologise.

HEYDON J: These questions of etiquette are very interesting. Is it not correct simply to call him Justice Robson?

MR GLEESON: That is a lot easier; thank you, your Honour.

HEYDON J: And the others are Justice Ashley and so on.

MR GLEESON: That will shorten my submissions significantly.

FRENCH CJ: That is to be encouraged

Thursday, April 1, 2010

in lay terms


shotgun: it's the modern clameur de haro.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

not a good start…

Lewis v Shimokawa [2010] HCATrans 21

MS S. NORTON, SC: Thank you, your Honours. This is an appeal from a decision of the New South Wales Court of Appeal - - -

HAYNE J: Well, no, it is an application for leave, I hate to tell you, Ms Norton.

MS NORTON: An application. I know, I have read it wrong, I am sorry. I have been sitting there too long. All right, start again. It is an application for leave to appeal from a decision of the New South Wales Court of Appeal.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

xmas presents for law geeks: the merger mystery board game

is Gummow J trying to crack a joke?

Aktas v Westpac Banking Corporation Limited & Anor [2010] HCATrans 43

        MR HALE SC:   That is correct. There was some debate about this in the Court of Appeal, but, yes, that is correct. One arm of the Bank certainly was aware of it. But the argument, at least, there was no reply. There is no contention of malice.

        GUMMOW J:   We are not worried about arms and legs. We are just worried about the Bank.

        MR HALE:   I am sorry?

        GUMMOW J:   We are not worried about arms and legs.

        MR HALE:   No.

        GUMMOW J:   We are worried about the Bank.

        MR HALE:   Yes. That clearly is one of the relevant circumstances...

Thursday, March 4, 2010

warning: prolonged litigation may cause poetic lament

Lujans v Yarrabee Coal Company Pty Ltd & Anor [2010] HCATrans 20

MR TOOMEY QC:     May it please, your Honours. I am reminded of an etching by Daumier of Monsieur l’Avocat standing outside the court with his obviously unsuccessful client beside him and he has his hands in the air and he is saying “Encore, le Cour de cassation”. This case has spent 29 days at first instance, four days in the Court of Appeal, an application for leave and a hearing here, sent back for a rehearing in the Court of Appeal, another four days, and here we are again.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

don't let Gummow J hear you impugn the Sydney Bar

Varas v Fairfield City Council [2010] HCATrans 18 (12 February 2010)

        MR MOSES SC:     The conduct which was alleged against the applicant which ultimately gave rise to a psychologist forming the view that she was suffering from some personality disorder, hence triggering the direction to attend a psychiatric assessment, included the behaviour there set out, that is –

"causing malicious gossip, threatening colleagues with disciplinary action, constantly reporting apparent work performance issues to management while not completing her own work, tantrums if challenged and very poor and hostile customer service.”

As well as reference to her sexuality. Probably conduct which some members of the Sydney Bar would be accused of, but nonetheless - - -

        GUMMOW J :     So what? Why make that comment?

        MR MOSES :     Your Honour, it is relevant to this point…

[FP: Mr Moses goes on without explaining the relevance of the comment]

Monday, February 22, 2010

how to make the perfect law cv


Wednesday, February 17, 2010

taking politeness too far

European Bank Limited v Robb Evans of Robb Evans & Associates [2010] HCATrans 3

MR MARTIN: Yes, your Honour. Your Honour, your Honours should also have with the notice of contention the outline of appellant’s ...

Saturday, February 13, 2010

modern negligence

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

the associate to Mr Gageler SC has some explaining to do

Hogan v Australian Crime Commission [2010] HCATrans 4 (4 February 2010)

       MR GAGELER SC:     ...If your Honours then go to page 211 it is said after the quotation from Justice Gibbs at about point 3 of the page that that first jurisdictional question involves making was in essence a value judgment - - -

       KIEFEL J:     You will have to forgive us if we are not following quite, Mr Gageler. We have every second page photocopied.

       HAYNE J:     So confine yourself to the odd-numbered pages, would you Mr Solicitor, and we will follow you.

       MR GAGELER:     I am really sorry because the crunch point is on an even page.

       HAYNE J:     An even-numbered page - we are in trouble.

Friday, February 5, 2010

in dexlicto

I like starting the day by diving into the awesome mind of Jessica Hagy.

Friday, January 29, 2010

another law pun


Sunday, January 10, 2010

ex delicto doors closed

fucius is on break while the High Court is.

  © Free Blogger Templates 'Photoblog II' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP